Rejection is normal in academic publishing, yet it is demotivating. Nobody wants to watch years of research and months of drafting and preparing the perfect research paper go to waste.
There’s no need to be concerned if you’re wondering why you get rejected so frequently or how you may avoid getting failed in your assignments. You can always take the easy way out by getting a professional assignment helper to get your paper done. However, for those who want to do it themselves, we have outlined a few frequent reasons why famous universities reject assignment papers which tend to frustrate students. There are two kinds of these: editorial and technical. To increase your chances of acceptance, avoid committing the following blunders when submitting your assignment.
Here are five reasons why this could occur
Your project was unrelated to the conference’s theme
In general, a conference will have a topic that is pertinent to the field’s major subject. An international development conference, for example, can concentrate on a specific country, region, or study approach. To increase your chances of getting your paper accepted to the conference, find a way to connect your work to the conference’s theme. Consider how your work might be tied to the theme—even if it isn’t directly related, you might be able to find a way for your findings to have an impact on the theme in general.
Another journal is reviewing your study work
Journals will not consider a work that is already under consideration by another journal. Most journals say in their rules for submitting that they won’t take a research paper that is already being looked at by another journal.
Your abstract had far too much theory and far too few results
While conferences frequently accept both theoretical and empirical work, getting a theoretical article approved can be significantly more difficult than getting an empirical paper accepted. If your work was rejected, it could be because it concentrated too much on theoretical aspects. If you have empirical data, even if it is fragmentary or preliminary, you should incorporate it in your abstract to improve your chances of acceptance. Alternatively, if you want to submit a purely theoretical work, make sure you carefully select the conference to which you are submitting. Some conferences welcome theoretical work more than others.
The writing is illegible
Manuscripts should be written in the simplest way possible so that they are easy to grasp. As a result, articles with a lot of jargon, poor diction, and improper language are frequently rejected by publishers. Other causes of poor writing include spelling mistakes and the absence of crucial text features such as affiliations, author lists, tables, and figures. If you find it hard to write in English, there are many ways to improve your research writing skills.
Your project lacks originality
The fact that the work presented at conferences is new and cutting edge is a huge lure. Some work, such as a replication of a previous study, is less likely to be accepted. Although this is valuable and significant work, it is not unique enough to be presented at a conference. Try to identify the unique perspective that your work provides, whether in terms of theoretical ideas, experimental methods, or prospective ramifications of your research. To convince people at a conference that hearing about your study would be helpful by schoology, you must be able to show how it is different from previous work.
Your abstract did not explain why your project is intriguing
Finally, even if you have the best project in the world, if your abstract isn’t good, you won’t be accepted to present at a conference. Make sure to adhere to any restrictions provided by the conference organisers; for example, conferences frequently have a tight word count for abstracts, as well as a required structure. Also, in your abstract, provide a brief summary of your findings and discuss why your research is innovative or essential. Make it simple for anyone to read your abstract and understand what your work is about and why it is interesting.
In conclusion
Here are five plausible explanations for why the journal editor rejected your work without peer review. Keep in mind that there could be more than one reason for the desk rejection. This list should help you decide what to do next, whether it’s sending an appeal letter, submitting your study to a different journal, or editing the manuscript.
If you’re not sure why your manuscript was rejected by a particular journal, getting a second set of eyes on it can be beneficial. Consider consulting with a mentor, a trustworthy colleague, or a friend about your manuscript or their experiences with your chosen journal. You could also upload your unpublished manuscript to a preprint server if you are willing to get feedback from the scientific community.
On Socialbuzzness, features articles on and about technology, business, lifestyle, and health. Socialbuzzness covers all kinds of news, including entertainment, technology, business, and finance.
